What happened to the Scribd Accounts?

We all know Bill Christy, he's the guy who wrote "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder" to which I actively contributed, as one can see in this post. He's also the one who publicly said "I would have shot Bruce McKay as well," as noted in this post. He also argued that Floyd was in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), now he says he isn't. And we know that he calls blacks he doesn't like "Niggers" and incessantly follows me around, and has been posting most of my SSN number that he found on an obscure document that I accidentally posted 3 years ago because he can't stand the fact that I exposed his Janus-faced nature.

Well yesterday I get wind of the fact that he lied and told Scribd.com that he was the sole author of the material and that I was in DCMA copyright violation. Scribd.com thus removed "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder" and my entire account, on a first strike. Not knowing what the heck happened, I posted it back up in another of my Scribd.com accounts, then once Scribd.com told me what happened I apologized and sent them the proof that I had editorial and content input and they initially told me I should write a counter-affidavit, which I said I would do.

As all of my public documents, with thousands and thousands of reads on them were on Scribd.com, I wrote them back when they initially told me I could write a counter-affidavit. They were quite rude and Mr. Bently lied, telling me there was a "zero tolerance" policy on Copyright, but that's not true, read their own website here and here:

"DMCA copyright infringement takedown notification policy

Submitted Feb 13 by Jason Bentley

It is our policy to respond to clear, legally valid notices of alleged copyright infringement that comply with the criteria established by Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") of 1998. In addition, we terminate without notice the accounts of users that we determine are repeat infringers based on a "three-strikes" policy."

"As an Internet service provider, Scribd must comply with the terms of the DMCA that require us to terminate the accounts of users determined to be "repeat infringers.""

Swift action for policy offenders: On every document upload page, there is a prominent warning message and mandatory check box displayed to help ensure that people understand and comply with Scribd’s Terms of Service. Repeat copyright infringers are banned from Scribd."

But this is at most two strikes, and the second violation (on the same case) came before I received notification from Scribd that I was allegedly in violation, but nonetheless they have removed my ability to file a counter-affidavit. So now I have to sue these guys -- who will not tell me the name of their corporate counsel -- naturally. I'll be down at the ACLU tomorrow, the same ACLU who wrote the Mass SJC briefs for Derrick Gillenwater after I sent him over there as Boston Bob.

Moral of the story: Always keep your emails, never trust Bill Christy -- he's a slippery, slimy sort of LE, kind of like what the folks at MASSCOPS called Marty Dunn: A slime bag.

Boston Bob withdraws postings.

There will be no further posts involving a certain attorney. While I operate independently of Derrick Gillenwater, neither he nor I need any flack from anybody at this time. He is getting his life back together after a harrowing ordeal and that is all I will say.

Will Barack Obama have to sue Citibank for racial discrimination again, this time for Derrick Gillenwater?

I got a report back that Citi Bank refused to cash Derrick Gillenwater's settlement check for his legal malpractice case against prominent Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner. As I understand it, he had tried last week, they told him his ID was expired and they would cash it when he got a replacement. He got a replacement but now two different branches gave him the runaround and THREATENED TO ARREST HIM!!!

This strikes me as a wrongful dishonor situation so I'll publish the names of those involved for public awareness.
UPDATE: Washington Street Branch manager is Carlo Caramanna and the District Manager is Tim Sullivan.
UPDATE: It is a wrongful dishonor per Your Style v. Mid Town Bank of Chicago, 150 Ill. App. 3d 421, 427-28, 501 N.E.2d 805 (1986) as noted in this Indiana government website and in this Bankers Online article, "Cashing Checks for non-customers."

Meanwhile a quick search on racial discrimination yields this interesting lawsuit against Citibank by none other than Barack H. Obama, alleging that the bank was disparately treating minorities in lending.

Apparently they never learn, so they'll have to be taught again.

Or did Jeffrey Denner issue a bogus check to buy time or get his ass off the hot seat because he knew that a certain Civil Rights organization is waiting in the wings to help Mr. Gillenwater? Only time will tell.

Heroin criminal defendant Kevin L. Barron, Esq. is for whom the bell tolls.

From my last post comments:

Anonymous said...
Buckshot

Barron looks like an undertaker in that chair.

Watch out for the snake.

Jill

March 19, 2009 12:01 PM

I don't know if he fancies himself a Kamikaze or Suicide Bomber - or just a liar who gets another continuance based on claims that he's involved in settlement but really is not -- but Kevin Barron is about to face some serious music.

Speaking of music, here's Derrick Gillenwater's MySpace:
http://myspace.com/buckshotdamack

And here's Norfolk District Attorneys William R. Keating and David Traub, who'll get a visit from me shortly so they can fully understand what kind of criminal defendant they're working with here, Norfolk Case no. 2008-350.

Boston Bob gives heroin-defendant and lawyer Kevin Barron the rest of the week to reconsider his Rule 3.3 Candor to the Tribunal issues.

Dear Walpole/Norfolk Prosecuting Attorneys and Board of Bar Overseers:

Defendant Barron is still clubbing a defenseless seal and former client named Derrick Gillenwater:

I am sending a copy of this post on March 17, 2009 to Defendant Kevin L. Barron and his attorney Michael Cunningham, as I noted that Kevin L. Barron, charged with heroin possession and distribution in Norfolk 2008-350 and the lone remaining Defendant in the valid legal malpractice case of Gillenwater v. Denner et al., Suffolk 05-5469, has in my opinion deliberately and intentionally lied to the Court in violation of Rule 3.3 Candor toward the Tribunal. How did he do that? by getting a continuance on Summary Judgement for settlement purposes, then refusing to make a settlement counter-offer.

FACT: On March 10, 2009 Barron, by and through Attorney Michael Cunningham wrote:

"1. The defendants respectfully assert that there is good cause to allow this motion to enlarge the tracking order deadlines. See Superior Court Standing Order No. 1-88(D)(1)(amendments to tracking orders will be granted for “good cause shown”). As set forth above, parties are engaged in ongoing attempts to resolve this case prior to the service of defendants’ motions for summary judgment. "

FACT: But it is now March 17 and no settlement offer. This is yet another in a long line of abuses suffered by Plaintiff Gillenwater as the Court has continually treated this young black man as legal pariah, all because he has the stones to sue his high-powered, wealthy white attorneys. In my opinion, it is not conduct becoming of a licensed attorney(s) and it needs to be reviewed in conjunction with his adjudicated "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel," by Judge Diane Moriarty as noted in my very first post.

Note that it was yet another "emergency motion" that was rewarded with an "emergency ORDER" but that the Court STILL HAS NOT MOVED on Plaintiff Gillenwater's goddamn "emergency motion" to have his basic First Amendment and Fundamental Rights restored to even file pleadings!

There are a set of attorneys reviewing this matter, and when they spring into action I wish them all of the luck in the World to get this thing straightened out as I prepare to pummel these guys with opt-in emails, demonstrations at CLE seminars, law school fliers and whatever else it takes to expose this legally and morally corrupt activity.

Remember, Derrick Gillenwater still does not even know the name of the insurance carrier, 6 months after asking, and the Court knows all about it and does not care, just as the Court has now failed to address the (admittedly vague) ORDER from the Court of Appeals to take further action on Plaintiff's request to file basic pleadings -- which was taken from him even though there has been no finding that he filed anything that was frivolous. Somehow I feel that there is at least one bag man involved in this.

Heroin.

Legal Malpractice and heroin-possession/smuggling charged Defendant Kevin Barron says: "When I get cocky, and I feel just like Jesus' Son... I think I can fight Derrick Gillenwater and win...." Dream on, Kevin. Dream on. Lou Reed understood it and you don't. The harder you play this hand the harder you're going to fall.

Lou Reed: Heroin.

Kevin Barron: Heroin.

Derrick Gillenwater: No Heroin.

Boston Bob: No Bullshit.

Well the scummy insurance company pulled the rug out from under Derrick Gillenwater on Settlement of Gillenwater v. Denner and Barron.

Well Derrick Gillenwater still doesn't know who the insurance carrier is -- which is totally illegal since he has probably asked about a dozen times, with the Court being fully aware of it. What he does know is that the insurance company can't seem to get him a check; he was promised on Friday, then some complications arose and he was promised "Monday."

It is now Monday, and the law students told me Mr. Gillenwater is just a bit upset over all of this. I completely understand his frustration.

What I don't understand is how Kevin Barron thinks he is going to fight this case, even though if anyone had an argument out of it it was Denner, because Denner was mostly vicariously liable; Barron is the one who did all of the "work." But I suppose if the Court continues to gag Mr. Gillenwater and stuff him in a broom closet Barron has a fighting chance. But something tells me Counselor Barron is in for a Big Surprise, one almost as big -- if not bigger -- than his ongoing heroin problems.

Maybe THAT's why he's not thinking clearly: If he's getting high on his own supply -- you know, provided that he "possessed" such a supply within the meaning of the Law -- that would certainly explain things.

It's still 1984: That's why Derrick Gillenwater cannot discover the name of Defendants Denner and Barron's insurance carrier.

Ever since October, 2008 Derrick Gillenwater has sought the identity of the insurance carrier(s) for legal malpractice Defendants Jeffrey Denner and Kevin Barron, and ever since October, 2008 the Defendants have successfully avoided providing this legally-required information. The Court has of course entirely silenced Mr. Gillenwater, so he can't blog about this case, and he can't even file any court documents -- even though there has never been any finding that he filed one single frivolous pleading.

The problem with not knowing the identity of the insurance company is that Mr. Gillenwater's rights have been violated (yet again) such that he can't proceed on a 93A Bad Faith claim for the insurance company not to pay on Defendant Barron's case. This issue was a point of inquiry in the Harvard Law School's Citizen Media Law Blog. Note that the Court identified the issue in its own ORDER while steadfastly ignoring Plaintiff Gillenwater's request. Now I hear that Mr. Gillenwater is supposed to settle his case with Attorney Denner on Monday, so the identity of the insurance company may finally be known because it may be on the check.

All of this made me wonder if it will be CNA Financial Corp., General Electric Co.'s Employers Reinsurance Corp., Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., American Financial Group Inc. or Arch Capital Group Inc, all of whom have been subpoenaed by former NY AG Eliot Spitzer for failing to diligently cover claims.

This case has shown us what is so very wrong about America's legal system in so many eye opening ways even I can't believe it, and I've been involved in law now for 3 solid decades. Derrick Gillenwater's music video hints at some of it, and as I understand it he is entitled to tell his life story, so long as he leaves out anything about this action. I'm sure by his conduct to this point (he refused to even discuss the amount of his upcoming settlement with Denner) that he will honor the terms of the agreement. Anyway, I look forward to hearing all about it -- especially the part about heroin-indicted Defense Lawyer Kevin L. Barron -- who apparently did not have his own insurance carrier. But again, how would we really know, since the Court doesn't care enough to order production of that information, ignoring Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and forbidding him to file any pleadings whatsoever.

At the Harvard Law Hip-Hop Conference, Derrick Gillenwater sits down to discuss his lawsuit against heroin-indicted lawyer Kevin L. Barron.

Harvard Law School goes Hip Hop...with Ryan Leslie!

Harvard Law School, by and through its Citizen Media Law Project, has been very helpful to Derrick Gillenwater and to your blog host Boston Bob in Mr. Gillenwater's quest for Justice when he sued high powered lawyers Jeffrey Denner (Big Dig settlement fame) and Kevin L. Barron (of heroin smuggling allegation fame, or infamy) for legal malpractice. The Defendants got all of his First Amendment Rights to blog about the case or to even file basic pleadings taken away before Defendant Denner reconsidered and took steps to settle this case today in fact so I commend him for that. As to Defendant Barron, well I encourage all of you to keep reading this blog because a certain very large and powerful Civil Rights organization is about to file some court documents. The story is all told here in these pages, and you can read the transcripts and listen to Derrick Gillenwater's music and watch his biographic video right here at this post.

Boycott Boston lawyer Kevin L. Barron, support Boston Hip-Hop and R&B singer Derrick Gillenwater: http://myspace.com/buckshotdamack

Boycott prejudiced Judge Linda Giles.

What were the bogus and eventually-dismissed charges on Mr. Gillenwater, you ask? Heroin distribution, ironically.

If he's convicted for heroin trafficking, will the Court give Kevin Barron designer leg irons to defend Derrick Gillenwater's legal malpractice case?

That's an interesting question because these plain-Jane models and dungarees ain't gonna' make it. The Jury will most assuredly not be impressed with that shit. Maybe he could commission Fendi to make him a matching ensemble or something.

Hell, actually one would think that Attorney Barron would want this case off of his plate now because if he gambles and looses in his April 2, 2009 hearing for heroin possession and distribution, Derrick Gillenwater will really have his way with him. How funny (funny ironic not funny ha-ha) that heroin distribution is the bogus charge slapped on Mr. Gillenwater when the cops planted the evidence in the police station baggies. But Barron failed to effectively argue that case so Mr. Gillenwater did hard time until he hired competent counsel and got a new trial, at which point the state whimpered away.

Opt-in emails are often an effective way to reach one's target audience.

They most certainly are. We will be discussing Derrick Gillenwater v. Jeffrey Denner and Kevin Barron, Suffolk 05-5469, and what the Defendants are doing to Plaintiff Gillenwater. Imagine, if I grow tired of this I can reach 30,000 lawyers in one key stroke. They will be interested to read about this sort of thing. Then I can pass fliers all around Greater Boston, whatever it takes.

Will Boston lawyer Kevin L. Barron do time for smuggling heroin like this idiot boy in Syracuse, NY?

We all know about Kevin Barron's problems of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel as ORDERED (and not appealed) from Judge Diane Moriarty. And thanks to me, we all know about his upcoming hearing on April 2, 2009 on his heroin possession and trafficking/distribution charges, Norfolk 2008-350. But what will happen? Well it's anybody's guess, really.

Here is what happened in Syracuse NY on a similar case last week.

Syracuse, NY -- A Syracuse man who smuggled drugs into jail, resulting in his brother's nearly fatal overdose, was sentenced today to serve two to four years in state prison.

County Judge Anthony Aloi said Marc Chetney, 32, of Bellevue Avenue, was lucky he wasn't facing a homicide charge. The judge also said Chetney had not learned anything from a prior prison sentence on a drug charge and was likely to be right back in trouble in the future.

Chetney pleaded guilty last month to first-degree promoting prison contraband, admitting he smuggled heroin to his 30-year old brother, Sean, in the Justice Center jail during a visit Nov. 24. The younger Chetney ended up hospitalized in critical condition after being found unconscious in his cell the following morning.

"You and he are probably equally stupid," Aloi said.
**********
I say Kevin Barron is also pretty stupid for letting Derrick Gillenwater's case get so out of hand, but then again maybe he just overlooked it, seeing as he's got other issues on his plate, like whether the Court will give him designer leg chains to match his suit when he defends this legal malpractice case at trial.

Enough already. It's time Jeffrey Denner and Kevin Barron had better start saying their prayers, and stop acting like bad white people.

I'm going to say this one last time fellas: Quit fucking around with Derrick Gillenwater. The shit you got away with on this kid thus far is absolutely insane and you fucking know it. You could have had this off of your plates a long time ago but you stalled because you thought you could get over on that little nigger boy.

You can't whip him like that, and now there are reinforcements coming that you don't own. Further, if you are now moving away from any of the settlement terms that Mr. Gillenwater worked with Defendant Denner (I have a copy of his stipulations) both of you will face the darkest days of your legal careers when I finish with you. And it's all going to be done with public information and there's not a goddamned thing you can do about it. As a white person, I can safely say you are giving the rest of us a bad name. Shit, Barron will be lucky to walk away from his April 2, 2009 hearing and case for heroin possession and distribution without an ankle bracelet or worse, not to mention his law license.

You guys have been warned.

-Boston Bob.

Deal or no Deal, and who is Defendant Jeffrey Denner and/or Defendant Kevin Barron's insurance carrier?

Well my congratulations may have been a bit premature. The law students tell me that Derrick Gillenwater is furious that he was promised a sum certain, and that he agreed to it orally with a set of stipulations he drafted and emailed to them, which makes a contract.

Now from what I hear they say they aren't certain when it will happen, and that now the insurance carrier wants the negotiated sum against Denner to be applicable to both Defendants.

Derrick Gillenwater should tell them to kiss his ass, along with the magic legal words, "I agreed to a Settlement.... not to an illusory promise."

Meanwhile, who is the insurance carrier? I'm about to ream them a good one, and Mr. Gillenwater has been lawfully seeking that information to which he is entitled, for months now, a record of that being so noted in Court.

And speaking of Court, let's see what happens on April 2, 2009 with respect to Defendant Kevin Barron's criminal charges for heroin possession and/or trafficking. What a coincidence, the very same crime that Derrick Gillenwater was chaged with and innocent of, is the very same crime that his lawyer is accused of, and he apparently really had the goods on him, as opposed to having the goods planted in the evidence room, which is what happened to Derrick Gillenwater. Good thing Barron is not representing himself, that might lead to another claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, like the (unappealed) ORDER handed down from Judge Diane Moriarty. The order is tiled in this post that includes Mr. Gillenwater's first Motion for Summary Judgment -- that the Court told him he is NOT ALLOWED TO FILE for some reason. It's really an unbelievable case. I just wonder how many other Derrick Gillenwaters are out there languishing without legal help, or the help of anonymous bloggers. Right here in America.

I emailed Kevin Barron's attorney and told him point blank: Some battles are not worth fighting, Sir.

In addition to screwing Derrick Gillenwater, did Kevin Barron smuggle drugs into the Walpole Prison? Norfolk Case No. 2008-350.

Note: Status Conference set for April 2, 2009.
There's Attorney Barron now, and as an infant, in the doctor's hands. In this post I asked what his problem is in taking care of the ineffective assistance of counsel he afforded to Derrick Gillenwater. But now I wonder how this case ever turned up for Attorney Barron.

By Martin Finucane, Globe Staff

A 46-year-old lawyer is facing several drug charges after he was allegedly found with packets of heroin as he was about to visit clients in the state prison in Walpole.

Kevin L. Barron was being searched by corrections officers at about 5 p.m. yesterday before entering MCI-Cedar Junction when the officers found "small packets of a powdery substance" that turned out to be heroin, said Norfolk district attorney's spokesman David Traub.

Barron pleaded not guilty today at his arraignment in Wrentham District Court to charges of delivering drugs to a prisoner, possession of a Class A substance, and possession with intent to distribute a Class A substance.....

......Judge Warren Powers also ordered Barron to stay away from the state prisons. But Weinstein said he would seek to have that order modified "because he's a good lawyer and how else can he effectively represent his clients if he can't meet with them?"
*************
.....Survey says, he can't effectively represent his clients in the first damn place, at least not Derrick Gillenwater, and that's a FACT.

Boston Criminal Lawyer Blog story.

Perhaps Mr. Gillenwater should request leave of court to inquire about the status of that case and any other alleged or proved crimes of moral turpitude, deceit or dishonesty. Or perhaps Attorney Barron and his insurance carrier should just Man Up and pay the fare for ineffective assistance of counsel, instead of getting these morally bankrupt judges to come hither.

Suffolk County Court of Appeals continues to dog Derrick Gillenwater; nobody cares about his First Amendment or Fundamental Rights.

Case No. 2009-J-058. . So what all of this basically says is:

We don't care that the Single Justice didn't address your First Amendment Rights. You are stuck with it unless you appeal to the Supreme Judicial Court. See G. L. c. 231, § 114.

But that's not necessarily an accurate assessment of the law goddammit:

The defendant in Duong presented the issue of a stay pending appeal to three separate judges before he got the full bench of the Supreme Judicial Court to consider the issue. He could have taken up more judicial resources if he had wanted to take the time, since the ordinary course of review of a decision by a single justice of the Appeals Court is to a full panel of that court, with the opportunity to seek further review in the Supreme Judicial Court.

Entry Date Paper Entry Text

02/02/2009 #1 MOTION to waive entry fee, filed by Derrick Gillenwater.

02/02/2009 RE#1: The motion is allowed and the petition is entered this date.

02/02/2009 #2 PETITION purs to GLc 231, s. 118 w/attach, filed by Derrick Gillenwater.

02/04/2009 RE#2 The requested relief is denied, except that the matter is remanded to the trial court for further action on plaintiff's motion for permission to file motion for summary judgment and to compel, consistent with the trial court's order of 10/23/08. (Duffly, J.) *Notice/Attest/Giles, J..

02/13/2009 #3 Motion to full appellate panel of plaintiff Gillenwater to have the court restore his first amendment rights and to grant him permission to file his motion to compel and his motion for summary judgment filed by Derrick Gillenwater.

02/13/2009 #4 In forma pauperis motion on interlocutory appeal of plaintiff Gillenwater to have the court restore his first amendment rights and to grant him permission to file his motion to compel and his motion for summary judgment filed by Derrick Gillenwater.

03/05/2009 RE#4: No action necessary. *Notice.

03/05/2009 #5 ORDER: "...(Paper #3)...treated as a notice of appeal from...order of Duffly, J...the notice of appeal...is struck, there being no right of appeal from the order of...February 4, 2009..." (Kantrowitz, J.) *Notice/Image.

Boycott Kevin L. Barron, but at least partial settlement may loom large in Gillenwater v. Denner, 05-5469.

Kevin Barron is a rapacious shark who will take a bite out of the ass of the client who already fed him before falling victim to his ineffective assistance of counsel, as held by Judge Diane Moriarty. It's a Good Thing that the law students tell me that Derrick Gillenwater may in fact be close to settlement in his legal malpractice case with Attorney Barron's co-Defendant, prominent Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner. If so, I applaud that development and wonder what Kevin Barron's excuse is -- because he's really much more culpable in all of this than Denner. Barron was the lead attorney-in-fact, not Denner. In my opinion, it is his fault that Derrick Gillenwater went to prison without Just Cause.

In fact, Denner was only liable by dint of vicarious liability; I'm not certain that he ever filed anything. It is my further understanding -- and this would be triple quadruple super-secret swear on your grandmother's grave hearsay -- that Denner had a bunch of red tape to get through in order to resolve this case, and that careful reflection on the ultimate denial of Plaintiff Gillenwater's Civil Rights led him to whatever agreement he has reached, or may be reaching, with his former client.

As to Attorney Barron, I hope Mr. Gillenwater takes him to trial and gives him the most embarrassing moment of his adult and professional life. Boycott Kevin L. Barron.

Support Derrick Gillenwater: myspace.com/buckshotdamack

Missing in Action, and presumed dead..... or prejudiced: Judge Linda Giles in Derrick Gillenwater v. Jeffrey Denner, 05-5469.

There's Plaintiff Gillenwater at sidebar facing Judge Giles and opposing counsel. Not a pretty sight, is it?


Okay, so first she acknowledges that Plaintiff Gillenwater, a black man without much money (having wasted all of it on Jeffrey Denner) is not allowed to file any memoranda whatsoever in his valid legal malpractice action against wealthy and very white high-powered Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner.

She then for some reason wants to know why Plaintiff Gillenwater might actually want a copy of the transcript from her court acknowledging this patent First Amendment and Fundamental Civil Rights violation. "Why do you need that," she asks. Twice, as if she needed to make herself look even more stupid, hateful and bigoted. To file a Motion for you to recuse your crooked, bigoted self, my dear.

But not to rest on her bigoted laurels, she then continues to ignore -- for an entire month now -- this Order from the Single Justice that there was to be further action on Plaintiff's Emergency and other Motions to restore his right to file a Motion for Summary Judgement and Motion to Compel regarding the Jeffrey Denner/Richard D. Abbott Oscar Atehortua (and presumably other) fiascos. See BD 2001-045.

Read all of the relevant transcript pages from bigoted Judge Linda Giles' courtroom right here with James S. Dilday, and listen to Derrick Gillenwater's music and watch his activist video about all of this right here.

Is this the first time that Jeffrey Denner screwed Derrick Gillenwater?

I am learning more from the law students, but it appears that Mr. Gillenwater was forced to report to a PO for an ancient case, under a Federal order --- when the law said he did not have to do so. Apparently his lawyer Jeffrey Denner let it all happen, and Mr. Gillenwater had to go to the law library himself to prove to the Judge that he was right, then they let him go. After he served time and had his Civil Rights violated, of course.

Jeffrey Denner, hard at work.

Can Derrick Gillenwater's daughter go through the same Federal Courthouse doors as Jeffrey Denner to get a public service award & Rights for Derrick?

Well, I have it on Good Faith through the Gillenwater Grapevine that on Tuesday, March 3 2009 Derrick Gillenwater's daughter will walk through the doors of the Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse and receive an award for her years of public service. It is the annual meeting for The Medical Foundation, with an awards ceremony to exactly two young women and a keynote speech to be delivered by Dr. David L. Katz (Yale School of Public Health) who will discuss prevention -- putting health back into health care reform. Perhaps while Ms. Gillenwater is there she can inquire if her father will ever receive any respect from any courthouse. We know he won't get any from that proud peacock Jeffrey Denner, seen strutting through the foyer a few years ago before he got each and every First Amendment and Fundamental Right taken away from her father in his valid legal malpractice claim against Denner and Kevin Barron. Read the Decisions that Harvard Law School and I contend are Unconstitutional right here.

Of course, as noted in the last post about the Touch FM 106.1 3,100 mile Walk for Power, Derrick Gillenwater is hardly the first intelligent black man in Boston to get his First Amendment or related liberties stripped away. Ask Councilman Chuck Turner and Lovell Dyett for starters. Could be time for some more fliers.

Jeffrey Denner victim Derrick Gillenwater to rally up with Touch FM 106.1 in their Walk for Power demonstration Monday, March 2, 2009.

Note: Postponed due to snow storm. In two short days, folks will be passing hundreds of fliers at the Touch FM 106.1 Walk for Power rally.

The Walk for Power, led by Charles Clemons, is meant to make plain black media owners’ plight and the African American community’s need to control and manage vehicles of information and education....

The station is already starting to track his autobiographic song "Da Mack is what they call me," (myspace.com/buckshotdamack) about power, corruption and lies and how prominent Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner and Kevin Barron got Mr. Gillenwater's First Amendment Rights to blog about his legal malpractice case against them taken away. He went to jail for no good reason, ordered Judge Diane Moriarty. Then they also got some morally vacant judges to strip away his rights to even file legal pleadings in the case. It sounds outlandish but it's true.

Defendant Jeffrey Denner, a white "Civil Rights" lawyer who has made tons of money from black folks and other minorities over the years, is the benefactor of these classist and racist court rulings that are all held on this blog.

Denner also claimed to have knowledge of Diane Wilkerson's pending investigation before it went public, and he used it against Mr. Gillenwater to threaten him. Jeffrey Denner also got this blog taken down until I forced the issue and Blogger restored it. The folks at Harvard Law School's "Citizen Media Project" have this to say (click on last link).

For background read this post about the first Unconstitutional Order, and this post about the gag orders on Gillenwater and Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner -- after the government made his case a public issue IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Boston is a racist town. Remember how the authorities treated allblackmen in the Carol Stuart murder "investigation?"

PS: No disrespect to local radio legend Lovell Dyett, but it just occurred to me as kind of an afterthought that his situation is directly related. Another black man of above-average intelligence, trying to assert himself in a manner that may challenge Boston's largely white power structure is effectively silenced after he and a younger white co-worker were temporarily released and called back. On return to work, his white counterpart was called back in a nice cherry time slot but he got the proverbial graveyard shift and at -- get this -- one sixth the airtime. Read the February 10 Boston Globe story and the February 26 Boston Banner story (sorry, that story I cannot find online. I used the February 5 story instead).

Let's review the original Unconstitutional Order from Judge Peter Lauriat in Gillenwater v. Denner, 05-5469.

NOTE: See how in the ruling that Mr. Gillenwater requested insurance carrier information? He's entitled to that BY LAW to file a 93A claim, but he still doesn't have it and the Court doesn't give a damn, the Court just wants Mr. Gillenwater -- and me I'm sure -- to shut up. That's not going to happen.

The law students reminded me that I have not actually posted the original Unconstitutional Order of October 10, 2008 from Judge Peter Lauriat. Well here it is, posted in the same fashion that I posted the January 13, 2009 transcript page from Judge Linda Giles still reinforcing the Unconstitutionality of all of this. Remember that Judge Lauriat is the author of a (1984 appropriately enough) Right-to-Know treatise "The Massachusetts Right to Know Law Handbook" published right here in Massachusetts. Unbelievable.

Meanwhile you may review the October 21 Unconstitutional Order from Judge Charles Spurlock affirming the first Unconstitutional Order right here.

The Question the law students and I keep getting is: "On what basis did the Court initially restrict Plaintiff Gillenwater's First Amendment and Fundamental Rights?"

The Answer I keep giving is: "There was no lawful basis for so doing on the speech issue, and on the filing restrictions there has never been a finding that Mr. Gillenwater filed any frivolous pleadings. The rulings are patently Unconstitutional and that's why the Court of Appeals full panel is still sitting on Mr. Gillenwater's appeal from the single Justice in 2009-J-58.... which Judge Giles has still failed to act on."

Related:
In depth analysis of the Spurlock Order.
Let's meet Judges Lauriat and Spurlock.
The Single Justice (non)ruling of February 5. Note that it doesn't even have the correct date for Judge Spurlock's Unconstitutional Order as it references an Order of October 23. That's because nothing is right about this classist, racist case, as succinctly noted in yesterday's post, with links to Plaintiff Gillenwater's activist video and music pages.

Derrick Gillenwater to speak with Boston Councilor Chuck Turner, ACLU about gag order in Gillenwater v. Denner, 05-5469.

The ACLU knows that the gag order against Councilman Turner is Unconstitutional. Read this story. The ACLU will also know by tomorrow (some of their members know today) that the gag order against Derrick Gillenwater is Unconstitutional as well.

Whether Jeffrey Denner had any input on the proposed Turner gag order as he claims to have had input on the Diane Wilkerson prosecution is yet to be seen. Read this post.

To see Judge Diane Moriarty's original decision finding ineffective assistance of counsel for several reasons read this post.

To see the Jeffrey Denner/Richard Abbott scandal that took Abbott's license to practice law for 2+ years because of ineffective assistance of counsel and lying to the BBO read this post.

To see Mr. Gillenwater's music page with activist video on this, and to see the Gillenwater gag order explained in one page of recent court transcript, read this post.

To see Mr. Gillenwater's liner notes read this post.

To see that Harvard Law School's Citizen Media Project considers the Denner-requested gag order on Derrick Gillenwater, preventing him from simply posting public information and blogging IN A CIVIL CASE Unconstitutional read their blog, specifically the last link on this main page.

Get this:

“This is not a gag order,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney John McNeil.

McNeil said the protective order he is seeking would simply prevent information the government releases to Turner’s lawyers from becoming public before trial.

Huh? What? To read similarly-insipid comments from Judges in Mr. Gillenwater's well-grounded legal malpractice case against prominent, wealthy and white Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner read the November, 2008 transcript from Judge Spurlock.

Then read the January, 2009 transcript from Judge Giles.

Then cry about how pathetic this Country has become. I guess a black man in Boston can't speak his mind when it comes down to facing a powerful, largely white establishment. Remember how they treated allblackmen in the Carol Stuart murder "investigation."

And look at the racist comments in both of the Chuck Turner stories as linked above. Here's a good one:

You would need a watermelon and a roll of duct tape to keep that huge mouth quiet. Can't they just sentence this clown and get it over with so he can start right letter from prison?

Watermelon, huh. How original. Dean Grose, a hater Mayor in Los Alamitos California just lost his job for that. Can't they just lock you up and sentence your stupid hateful ass for being a racist clown bigot?

By the way, the case the ACLU should be running is State v. Carmichael, 326 F.Supp.2d 1267 (M.D.Ala. 2004).

Maybe Project Hip Hop will understand why Derrick Gillenwater cannot even respond to Jeffrey Denner's Motion for Summary Judgment: He's not allowed!

Think about this: Derrick Gillenwater, as clearly seen in yesterday's post with Attorney James S. Dilday and the relevant transcript pages from Mr. Gillenwater's legal malpractice case against prominent, wealthy and white Boston "Civil Rights" Attorney Jeffrey Denner, is still not permitted to file anything in court. This is so, even though there is no finding that he ever filed anything frivolous.

When he did properly file for permission to file, it was ignored. He can't blog, he can't file, he can't do anything but get beat down. And he can't adequately respond to Denner's Motion without his discovery regarding other cases in which Denner was involved, such as the Oscar Atehortua scandal BD 2001-045 where Denner's buddy lost his license (suspension) for 2+ years. Folks, you can't get any more obvious than that. What a joke. What a crying shame, the shame of Boston it is.

Here is the Project Hip Hop website.

Here are links to Plaintiff Gillenwater's Music Page, with an activist video about this situation.

Here are Derrick Gillenwater's phenomenal liner notes.

Gillenwater v. Denner, 05-5469 with Judge Linda Giles: They apparently have transcripts in Hell. Here's the proof.

Dear Jeffrey Denner:
When your buddy James S. Dilday gave Derrick Gillenwater the legal opinion authored by Judge Diane Moriarty (the court kept telling Mr. Gillenwater they couldn't find it) he said "handle your business."

Well he certainly is. So you just keep on handling yours (which apparently includes oversight of people like Diane Wilkerson as noted yesterday) and Mr. Gillenwater, the law students and I will continue to handle ours.

Oh, wait, I know. You're not a racist. Some of your best friends are black. Some of them are even tenured professors in criminal justice. Be that as it may, Harvard Law School's Citizen Media Law Project called this situation "Likely Unconstitutional." (It should be the last link on the page but it's not working now for some reason. Denner is a Harvard Graduate, coincidentally I'm certain it's just a technical glitch at the moment).

Now then, Judge Giles should recuse herself for her ignorant and biased comments seen at page 8, given the law on legal malpractice in this milieu:

Labovitz v. Feinberg 47 Mass.App.Ct. 306, 713 N.E.2d 379 Mass.App.Ct.,1999 July 16, 1999 (Approx. 9 pages). That court cites Belford v. McHale Cook & Welch, 648 N.E..2d 1241, 1246 (Ind.Ct.App.1995) ("The burdens on postconviction relief petition and a legal malpractice claim are the same.")
**********
Suggested reading: John M. Peckham v. Boston Herald, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 282 (1999) applied to Gillenwater v. Denner, Suffolk 2005-5469. Read also the Unconstitutional Order holding "The purpose was to prevent Gillenwater from using any references to the Defendant Jeffrey Denner."

What? Huh? Why? The Court can't do things like that in America, and for Jeffrey Denner to accept it and to be a benefactor of this sort of clearly unlawful activity that deprives a man of basic First Amendment and other Fundamental Rights makes him a total bigot in this instance, my previous respect for him dying by the minute.

Derrick Gillenwater says Jeffrey Denner might as well be a racist oppressor for his comment about Diane Wilkerson, "Who's gonna help you, kid..."

UPDATE: Here is the January 13, 2009 Transcript.

Fact: Derrick Gillenwater is suffering under Unconstitutional Court rulings and a very powerful attorney trying to defend a well-pled legal malpractice case, but he will testify Under Oath that prominent, wealthy Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner looked him right in the eye weeks before any of Diane Wilkerson's alleged criminal activity took place -- but well after he was aware of Mr. Gillenwater's 2005 legal malpractice lawsuit against him and Kevin Barron -- and said:

"Who's gonna' help you kid? Diane Wilkerson? I've already got her on tape."

Anybody think Mr. Gillenwater is lying? I don't. But the question is who the hell is Jeffrey Denner to say something like that? How much power does this guy really have? He acts like he owns the World. So it's no wonder Jeffrey Denner looks so smug in the "I'm not a racist" post. He may not be a racist but he sure is a power monger who hates to admit he's wrong, and he gets judges in his pocket to do whatever he wants, Unconstitutional or not. Wait for me to post the ridiculous transcript from Judge Linda Giles' courtroom tomorrow. Update, here it is. Mr. Gillenwater and a law student dropped a copy with City Council this afternoon. Here is the last ridiculous transcript from Judge Spurlock.

I'll say this: Councilor Yancey and Yoon and soon the entire City Council and Mayoral Candidates will be reviewing this matter at the behest of a certain local pastor. Now let's see how smug Mr. Denner and the Court system are in light of the liner notes and the transcript I'm reading right now. Here are the liner notes on the overleaf, and here are the links to Derrick Gillenwater's wonderful music and video, Including a song about this very situation.

In the overleaf you will see why I hope Mr. Gillenwater gets Justice and his pound of flesh.

Here come the liner notes from Derrick Gillenwater's CD; they are amazing.

Well let me qualify that: I believe they are going to be amazing. I'm sorry to tease you with something I'm not permitted to share yet, but I'm hoping that I can share these with you later today or at least by the end of the week. All the law students will tell me is that Mr. Gillenwater mentions that he "did not get his money's worth" with prominent and wealthy Boston Attorney Jeffrey Denner and Kevin Barron. Also, he offered to work with them in some sort of gentlemen's fashion if they would "wake up and do the right thing," but they have refused. Apparently they disagree with Judge Moriarty's decision finding that they provided ineffective assistance of counsel, which is legally tantamount to legal malpractice.

Funny thing, though, neither Defendant ever appealed that order so it's kind of res judicata, claim or issue preclusion, something like that.

I'm getting curiouser and curiouser. Here is Mr. Gillenwater's MySpace and related YouTube video, in which legal malpractice Defendant Jeffrey Denner appears.

Meanwhile people in Boston's church community are offering to help. That is all I will say at this point until a meeting is scheduled with said persons and people in government.

Pack your bags and strap yourself on in, Jeffrey Denner: You and Derrick Gillenwater are taking a trip to Asia.

First off, there is an interesting comment at the good old boy network post showing the lame Court of Appeals Order that intentionally did not mention Mr. Gillenwater's First Amendment or Fundamental Rights claims.

Next, here's where you can experience a YouTube music video that addresses Derrick Gillenwater being hosed by the court system and his former lawyer, Jeffrey Denner.

Now then, I told you in a post just the other day that I was about to start taking a more proactive approach in this matter. Well I made my first move last night, and in the next week or so we can expect that people all over the Asian Continent will hear about the First Amendment/Fundamental Rights deprivations suffered by Derrick Gillenwater at the hands of wealthy white people like his former lawyer and the current legal system in Boston.

Then people in Asia -- and I mean A LOT OF PEOPLE IN ASIA will really see how American Justice operates. I'm not going to tell you who or what it is, but it's major. Anyway, take a look at the injustice. Want more? You got it:

http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2008/mystery-blogger-caught-first-amendment-flap

http://dennerlaw.blogspot.com/2008/12/merry-christmas-for-cause-of-justice.html

http://dennerlaw.blogspot.com/2008/12/lets-review-unconstitutional-court.html

http://dennerlaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/derrick-gillenwater-goes-head-to-head.html

Hallelujah, Sweet Mother of Jesus, Derrick Gillenwater is going to get his transcript from Judge Linda Giles in Gillenwater v. Denner, 05-5469.

In the last post I wrote "I wonder what Mr. Gillenwater's next video will be, after he obtains a copy of the unlawfully-withheld transcript from Judge Linda Giles' January "Litigation Control Conference." This is a simple and basic Human Right in America, a copy of your courtroom transcript for Christ's Sake."

Well through Divine Intervention or something -- perhaps a couple of well-placed phone calls from me to the Court Administration director today -- I hear that Mr. Gillenwater is now scheduled to receive the transcript next week. Let's hope it's not Friday at 4:59 p.m. I also wrote to my mailing list and told them I am about to start taking a much more proactive approach to this case, and the information contained on this blog will be appearing in places that the Defendants fear the most.

Key passages will include the heated exchange between Mr. Gillenwater and Judge Giles when she allegedly berates him about what a Summary Judgment is (he seems to know damn well what it is) then allegedly tells him he has to ask another judge for permission to get her transcript, then allegedly tells him the other judges are under no duty to respond to his requests for basic First Amendment Fundamental Rights to file pleadings.

From what I hear -- but which will not be registered on the record -- there was an awesome collective gasp from the courtroom when Mr. Gillenwater respectfully asked for the transcript.

"What do you want that for?" Judge Giles eventually stammered.

Well now she knows.